Moderator: Moderators
), I remember thinking that THAT thing took some excellent video. notalwaysright10000 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 29, 2019 11:40 pm I have no interest whatsoever in posed scenes, though I certainly wouldn't say I'm "against" them.
What I am against is fake candids produced by liars, which unfortunately is at least 90% of putative candids these days, including every single one of the hostess shoeplay clip stores.
(To anyone who is so gullible that they actually believe some itinerant shoeplay cappers are traveling year round from motor show to motor show, capturing this stuff on a literally daily basis without ever getting caught and banned from these shows, well then I've got some moon rocks I'd like to sell you for the unbelievably low price of $299.95 each.)
How to spot fakes?
This is like asking how to recognize faces or spot liars. It's mostly an ability you either have or don't, but there are some cues to watch for:
*The first and most common "tell" is when they zoom in for a face shot and the "girl" is supposedly having a conversation with someone, but" she" is clearly just moving her lips and not actually saying anything. (You see exactly the same thing in movie extras.)
*The shoeplay is often artificial, either too fast and jerky or too "seductively" slow. Bad shoeplay acting is as easy for me to spot as bad facial expression and voice acting.
*There are often camera angles that would be very difficult to get without arousing suspicion. In the really badly made fakes, there will often be a curious lack of other people or ambient noise in a supposedly public place.
But unfortunately, if you're not perceptive enough to spot these things on your own, it's unlikely you'll pick up on them just because I've alerted you to watch out for them.
Finally - and this is the elephant in the room some people clearly don't want to be talked about - there has been a huge influx of transgender women into both clip store and youtube videos. I'm not sure why this is, but I suspect there are two possible reasons:
1) Trans porn actresses perhaps have trouble getting work in conventional porn, and a so are funneled into niche fetish porn that doesn't show genitalia
2) Many of them are apparently exhibitionists who get a kick out of "fooling" people and see this as confirmation that they're "passing". (This would explain a lot of the super tacky posed videos that now comprise almost all of the search results on YouTube.)
Oh, and I'm 99% certain that these people are responsible for having conducted a coordinated flagging campaign against all the genuine candid videos that used to exist. A while back on a video that appeared in the "accidentally discovered" thread (and as a clip on that parasite James Shawn's channel) I saw some comments that provided the workplace number for the girl shoeplayling and encouraged people to call it because she supposedly loves talking about it.
Now, there are clearly many idiots in the world, but NOBODY is really THAT goddamn stupid.
). If they were wearing flats or pumps, they were no nylons. The only other two girls that had on nylons, were in those high heels with the laces. I have video. Plus my wife was with me, so I couldn't stick around to see the action like I would have liked.There was even a leaked training video on YouTube a few years ago instructing the "hostesses" how to dip, but this was entirely obvious to me long before I saw that video, just as I knew "reality" TV was every bit as fake as professional wrestling when I was fourteen. (Like Jesus Christ, how do most people miss things like switches in camera angle that would make the other camera visible in frame if it were really filmed in real time?)Mr. Mike wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:20 am I get the camera angles and especially the piss poor dipping attempt. Love when you you the exact same move by 8-9 different women...1 guy on Clips4sale the women have had the same move for 3 years.
But how the hell can you say, without sound that you can "spot" someone who is just mouthing the words. Without sound it's pretty much your word against someone else...no way to prove or disprove if they are are having a real conversation.
Well fuck me running. I guess discussing it in private isn't an option either. I'm dead curious now.notalwaysright10000 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 8:00 am @ShoeplayJ
Oh, believe me I would very much like to drop names - and evidence - but the last time I did that I got threatened with a ban, I so guess that's a no.
Ah, CCfeet. I gotta say fake or not, I definitely enjoy his work. Say, didn't he post here recently or am I thinking of someone else?notalwaysright10000 wrote:
By the way there is one clip store that I'm convinced is either real or very well faked. It's called CCfeet dot com or something like that. (I have nothing to do with them and they're not paying me.)
There are also two I know of on Clips4sale that look convincing, but I'd prefer not to mention them because for all I know it might get them in trouble with whoever oversees the larger host site. (I could easily imagine the bigger, fake clip stores throwing their financial weight around to get those stores banned or something.)
Oh and one last thing: if I seem like a much angrier person than I used to be that's because I am -for good reason.
Yeah the guy from CC Feet posted here a few weeks ago (I think he's Dutch) but his site appears to be more or less dormant, with no new material in about six months or so.ShoeplayJ wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 8:25 amWell fuck me running. I guess discussing it in private isn't an option either. I'm dead curious now.notalwaysright10000 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 8:00 am @ShoeplayJ
Oh, believe me I would very much like to drop names - and evidence - but the last time I did that I got threatened with a ban, I so guess that's a no.
Ah, CCfeet. I gotta say fake or not, I definitely enjoy his work. Say, didn't he post here recently or am I thinking of someone else?notalwaysright10000 wrote:
By the way there is one clip store that I'm convinced is either real or very well faked. It's called CCfeet dot com or something like that. (I have nothing to do with them and they're not paying me.)
There are also two I know of on Clips4sale that look convincing, but I'd prefer not to mention them because for all I know it might get them in trouble with whoever oversees the larger host site. (I could easily imagine the bigger, fake clip stores throwing their financial weight around to get those stores banned or something.)
Oh and one last thing: if I seem like a much angrier person than I used to be that's because I am -for good reason.
Is your anger pertaining to what we're discussing here?
Btw, didn't you shoot videos in the past? I feel like I remember you saying you did once, but I'll be damned if I'm gonna go searching through the forum. Again though, I could be thinking of someone else.
I can seriously tell you I've never paid attention to background people in movies to see if they are really speaking or not.notalwaysright10000 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 7:55 amThere was even a leaked training video on YouTube a few years ago instructing the "hostesses" how to dip, but this was entirely obvious to me long before I saw that video, just as I knew "reality" TV was every bit as fake as professional wrestling when I was fourteen. (Like Jesus Christ, how do most people miss things like switches in camera angle that would make the other camera visible in frame if it were really filmed in real time?)Mr. Mike wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 5:20 am I get the camera angles and especially the piss poor dipping attempt. Love when you you the exact same move by 8-9 different women...1 guy on Clips4sale the women have had the same move for 3 years.
But how the hell can you say, without sound that you can "spot" someone who is just mouthing the words. Without sound it's pretty much your word against someone else...no way to prove or disprove if they are are having a real conversation.
As for the fake talking, you are aware that there are people who can read lips, right? In fact almost everyone can do this to a limited degree.
Are you seriously telling me you've never noticed, for example, how background extras in television scenes that take place in restaurants will often move their lips without speaking, and nod their heads up and down in ways that are so clearly artificial that it's entirely obvious they're not really having a conversation?
You're telling me I need sound to be sure about this?
Wow...
Yep. I've got an external 2TB harddrive, which houses a lot of important backups, but is also home to a large collection of videos I've downloaded on YT. I'd say a good 60-75% of the space being taken up on that thing is from such videos. On one hand I'm grateful to have such a collection, on the other hand, it's a pain, because not all of what's there is exactly A1. Sometimes I'll download something that I may not have been dying to see in the moment, but saved it anyway, because it very well may not be there in the morning. It's very rare to find videos lasting too long these days. A lot of older accounts seem to still have their content untouched, but it's also probably because those accounts have been dormant for some time. Whereas new and active accounts are being terminated like clockwork. YT is really cracking down on this stuff these days, and I really wish they'd chill.tobydole wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 10:52 pm I agree with you guys on the complaints of the YouTube comments. It is very, very hard to want to share any clips on here (or anywhere for that matter) since there is such a high risk of people ruining it. And it's pretty much gotten to the point where if you don't download the clip immediately you run a high risk of never seeing it again.
Again, well said, sir. I'd say we have a very sensible bunch here, but it seems like many others who share this fetish, can't seem to control themselves. As with almost anything, it's always the loud minority bunch, that messes it up for the entire group. I'm really glad that "shoeplay" has not become a mainstream recognizable term. Women are on edge enough these days, in this current political climate, with this MeToo movement; the last thing we need is for them to feel like they can't even take their shoes off in public without being preyed upon, by some screwy, self-entitled, jack in the box that can't contain himself.tobydole wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 10:52 pm This is why I sometimes wish that if I had to have this fetish, shoeplay and all, that I was the only one with it. Nothing against any of you but could you just imagine a world where no one knew that feet could be seen as a sexual object except for yourself. Yes, it might make a screwy sex life, but just think. Shoeplay would be akin to fiddling with hair or something, even if it still is we know most girls are aware of foot fetishes. A world where they all would freely do anything with there shoes with no worries whatsoever. Ugh.
— and no way was I telling my parents. Sigh...Isn't that the truth. The old days were a Wild, Wild West of untamed links, fan pages on GeoCities and AOL, postage-stamp images and videos if that, and our stories. I wouldn't trade that content for today's content...and yet, the diversity was intriguing even if the quality was stunted by the era's technology. I'd say the average folk were smarter then too...but there were always guys sending letters to hosts asking for a little on-camera action. Maybe a lot of that got filtered out at the mailroom. Now, it's easier to be too damn direct. That applies to a lot of areas that can be abused, but for us it's particularly poignant.
You already stated your idea about that store, and I already TOLD YOU TO STOP. Since I personally know the owner of the store and i can PERSONALLY guarantee his clips are candids. Being an ugly woman is different from being a transgender, and even if she was that wouldn't say that's a staged clip.notalwaysright10000 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 10:38 pm @Mr Mike
He's still lying of course, and only put up that disclaimer in the hope of masking the smell of bullshit, which seems to be getting quite overpowering.
Here's a clip from his store. Look at the face shot at the twenty-five second mark. Not only is that person very obviously transgender, she's wearing a ridiculous wig as well. "Real only" indeed.
