Crazy For Feet Forum

In the true vane of this thread, here is an outstanding video.

Shoes off @ 23:13, 39:40, 43:00, 49:25 and a few more after that.
Girl in green dress.

notalwaysright10000 wrote:Yes, the last refuge of the internet dipshit: :

Honestly, dude, you need someone to teach you to relax. This is not real life, it's just an Internet forum where perverts go to find masturbation material. We all know why we're here.

Despite your incessant, loud protestations to the contrary, you're not terribly impressive. You brought a gun to a pillow fight. And I'm having a tough time with your comparisons to Tyson and Ali. Those guys were the pinnacle of their sport. You're a common or garden Internet masturbater.

More fluff.
There is no prosody in text, but you can't even read my rather obvious tone despite the smilies. I'm not ranting at you in stentorian terms, I'm laughing at you in tone of sardonic levity. Someone is fucking up my fun and I don't like it. Can you grasp that, dipshit?

If whether I'm "terribly impressive" is contingent on your capacity for astute assessment, it's clear nothing of consequence is at stake on that score.
And you flatter yourself, with rather extravagant self charity, in suggesting you wield anything nearly as substantial as a pillow. You're trying to chop down a cactus with a balloon.

Now make an intelligible point or don't.
Shit or get off the throne.

^
Holy shit I was pretty much in agreement with you but you come across as such a smug, pretentious ivy league wannabe with your use of isoteric language that 99% of English speakers don't use. Lighten up and speak like it's 2014, not 1790.

PS. Yes, I'm adding fuel to the fire

Mr. Mike wrote:In the true vane of this thread, here is an outstanding video.

Shoes off @ 23:13, 39:40, 43:00, 49:25 and a few more after that.
Girl in green dress.

Thank you Mike...this debate should be taken to a different thread

Isoteric? Maybe if you had a little more exposure to guys like me you'd be less prone such embarrassing malapropisms.

I'm actually from a working class background. My dad is a mechanic but he knows what a library card is for and could tell you more about ancient history or English literature than many of my professors. One of my fondest childhood memories is of watching him deal a thoroughgoing verbal smackdown to a smarmy psychologist who had grossly underestimated him. And guess what? I'm not going to apologize for having read few books and gotten into a good grad school.

The comments from people like you are always the same crushingly banal tripe, even using the same five or six words again and again and again like it's some kind of linguistic Babinsky reflex.
It's always the two p's ("pompous" and "pretentious", as if these even mean anything), ad poplulum appeals to how "everyone else" supposedly speaks, and juvenile, cartoonish comparisons to what you imagine people sounded like some time in the past. (Did I use a single anachronism?)
Next you'll be telling me to stop abusing my thesaurus (I've heard that at *least* sixty times) to which my response is, stop neglecting your dictionary.

Believe it or not I despise the kind of person you think I am, but people like you, who can't tell the difference, and are so easily threatened by a few less common but perfectly serviceable words, make it very difficult for me to be polite or give a damn about your insecurities.

notalwaysright10000 wrote:Isoteric? Maybe if you had a little more exposure to guys like me you'd be less prone such embarrassing malapropisms.

I'm actually from a working class background. My dad is a mechanic but he knows what a library card is for and could tell you more about ancient history or English literature than many of my professors. One of my fondest childhood memories is of watching him deal a thoroughgoing verbal smackdown to a smarmy psychologist who had grossly underestimated him. And guess what? I'm not going to apologize for having read few books and gotten into a good grad school.

The comments from people like you are always the same crushingly banal tripe, even using the same five or six words again and again and again like it's some kind of linguistic Babinsky reflex.
It's always the two p's ("pompous" and "pretentious", as if these even mean anything), ad poplulum appeals to how "everyone else" supposedly speaks, and juvenile, cartoonish comparisons to what you imagine people sounded like some time in the past. (Did I use a single anachronism?)
Next you'll be telling me to stop abusing my thesaurus (I've heard that at *least* sixty times) to which my response is, stop neglecting your dictionary.

Believe it or not I despise the kind of person you think I am, but people like you, who can't tell the difference, and are so easily threatened by a few less common but perfectly serviceable words, make it very difficult for me to be polite or give a damn about your insecurities.

Ok

Oh, by the way, if anyone else is tiring of this (who isn't?) Mr. Mike made a great post on topic a ways back that I wouldn't want to get buried.

bump

Mr. Mike wrote:In the true vane of this thread, here is an outstanding video.

Shoes off @ 23:13, 39:40, 43:00, 49:25 and a few more after that.
Girl in green dress.

1:28 black girl / 12:58 girl with glasses little heelpopping - 13:13 slipped in / 23:25 see bottom left corner / 1:08:53 / 1:44:34


1:08:47 girl on the left dipping / 1:17:28 - 1:17:52 little heelpopping / again 1:33:25 - 1:34:30

59:40

56:45 girl in yellow

1:02:20 - 1:02:45 mature wife / again 1:06:00 - 1:08:50

1:36:45 girl in red pantyhose / again 1:39:30 - 1:43:02

NICE !! Thank you

For me BSU SGA is always a surprise !! Unfortunately the main "table" is covered.
I'm waiting for wednesday :-)

dipdang wrote:NICE !! Thank you

For me BSU SGA is always a surprise !! Unfortunately the main "table" is covered.
I'm waiting for wednesday :-)

If you want I will post the videos with time stamps from the years 2010-2013 the next days or weeks ;)

Samantha beautiful

Will really appreciate it albert79 cant wait

albert79 .. yes I will appreciate 2010-2013 :-)
fantastic work.
Thank you

FYI...all those BSU SGA videos are posted on this thread, you just have to go back a while. Back in 11'-13' weposted all those shoeplay videos.

Yeah im aware but maybe we miss something. U never know

1:00:30 - 1:02:10 / 1:51:00 (left girl dipping)

25:40 + 43:20 (girl in grey)

35:20-35:40, 48:50, 1:06:20 (girl with grey top, shoeplay in slingback) / 45:09 (girl in the middle) / 50:45-51:30 different shoeplay

1:06:35 (girl with glasses)

17:18 (girl with glasses) / 19:30 (girl in the middle)

1:24:53, 1:32:02 (girl in the middle) / 1:26:29 - 1:27:20, 1:31:32 (girl with glasses)

2:20, 11:30, 12:40, 28:10 (girl in the middle)

21:50 - 22:10 (in the background, hard to see), 22:53, same girl as in the previous video

27:48 (girl with glasses)

0:58 (girl in blue) / 31:00, 31:35 (girl in the middle)

0:04, 34:56, 46:55 (girl in the middle) / 22:08, 1:11:02-1:12:50 (girl in blue) / 41:06 (girl with glasses)

More will come...

Hellpoping 6:18

Damn i miss Natasha from (BSU SGA) she was the best!