Mr. Mike wrote: ↑
Wed Mar 06, 2019 6:22 pm
Oh God...I think I've heard it all now. Notalways, you've had some outlandish claims, but this one...cone on. Sometimes it's just stupid people doing doing stupid things. There are so many idiots out there, we see it everyday.
You have all these theories, conspiracies, claims...and the problem with all of them is none of them can be proved either way. You claim to be "the smartest guy in every room"...but there is no way you are proving these girls that you claim are guys based on the video. Sorry, you just can't, so it's easy for you to "claim" you are 100% correct.
I'm sorry but I don't see these owners of clip stores sabotaging these videos ..it doesn't happen enough to prove your point. It's just dumb people being dumb.
That is all
Okay Mike, several points:
1)I never claimed to be "the smartest guy in every room" so please don't misleadingly use the quotes. I am
extremely intelligent, but you said it, not me. My Youtube name was a joke, because that channel was created when I was younger and liked to troll people with intentionally idiotic comments. I changed the name here to NOTalwaysrigt10000 so people I know from YouTube would recognize me but no one would think I was seriously claiming I was always right. (The latter intent seems not to have been fulfilled.)
2) Please don't revive the discussion regarding the proposition "these girls that you claim are guys". I'm not going there again, but suffice it to say I was threatened with a ban when I'd barely even begun
to present my evidence, so you have no idea what I can and and can't prove in potentia
. Also, evidence is only as good as the evaluative capacities of those reviewing it. If it were otherwise, there would be no such thing as creationists, climate change denalists, or Trump supporters.
3. Nothing I've said said is conspiratorial. There is a tree of logical possibilities here, the other branches of which terminate in conclusions much more far-fetched than anything I've posited. It is perfectly clear that there's been a concerted flagging campaign as well as a host of comments by bots and sock accounts. The only really open question is who has been doing it and what incentives drove them. The answer to that may not be certain, but it hardy calls for wild speculation.
Uh, OK, what should I write here...
Sweet and to the point:
My strong preference is for seated, both-feet shoeplay. Dangling, and shoeplay with open-toed shoes or mules, I'm afraid don't do as much for me.