Welcome to our new forum!
If you are having any sort of problems, click here to see solutions to common problems.
You can also send us a message by clicking on "contact us" on bottom of page

Would you be willing to watch a genetically male woman shoeplay?

Let's share our thoughts about the main subject of the website or about the scenes we have there!

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
OceanWaves3947
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2017 11:19 am

Would you be willing to watch a genetically male woman shoeplay?

Post by OceanWaves3947 » Mon Aug 13, 2018 4:00 pm

The vast majority of us on this forum are obviously attracted to female shoeplay, and I am, as well. However, sex is not always something concrete and binary. Sometimes, there are people who are genetically male (have a Y chromosome), yet, due to an insensitivity to male hormones, develop as and look like females. This condition is called Swyer syndrome or androgen insensitivity syndrome. If you look up the condition, you’ll be able to see pictures of individuals who have it. Personally, I still find many individuals with this condition to be quite attractive, and I would enjoy the shoeplay of an individual with this condition just as much as that of someone who is genetically female.

Yes, I know she’s technically a male, but so what? If she’s cute as hell, and if her shoeplay is cute as hell, then I really don’t care.

It’d be interesting to find out the opinions of other members of this forum on this quite fascinating issue.



notalwaysright10000
Posts: 478
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 1:12 am

Re: Would you be willing to watch a genetically male woman shoeplay?

Post by notalwaysright10000 » Tue Aug 14, 2018 6:35 am

No. And frankly you're getting on my nerves with these questions. I'm no homophobe, but it's just obnoxious to walk onto a golf course and try to get a football game going.
Uh, OK, what should I write here...
Sweet and to the point:
My strong preference is for seated, both-feet shoeplay. Dangling, and shoeplay with open-toed shoes or mules, I'm afraid don't do as much for me.

User avatar
ShoeplayJ
Posts: 185
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 5:23 am
Location: USA

Re: Would you be willing to watch a genetically male woman shoeplay?

Post by ShoeplayJ » Tue Aug 14, 2018 12:52 pm

OceanWaves3947 wrote:
Mon Aug 13, 2018 4:00 pm
The vast majority of us on this forum are obviously attracted to female shoeplay, and I am, as well. However, sex is not always something concrete and binary. Sometimes, there are people who are genetically male (have a Y chromosome), yet, due to an insensitivity to male hormones, develop as and look like females. This condition is called Swyer syndrome or androgen insensitivity syndrome. If you look up the condition, you’ll be able to see pictures of individuals who have it. Personally, I still find many individuals with this condition to be quite attractive, and I would enjoy the shoeplay of an individual with this condition just as much as that of someone who is genetically female.

Yes, I know she’s technically a male, but so what? If she’s cute as hell, and if her shoeplay is cute as hell, then I really don’t care.

It’d be interesting to find out the opinions of other members of this forum on this quite fascinating issue.
Ayyee, I'm pretty much with notalwaysright10000 on this one. It seems like you're trying to sell us on male shoeplay. If that's what you like, then by all means do you. But if you're trying to convince us, you're wasting your time.

Anyway, though I can sympathize with those with Swyer syndrome, I doubt I'd be interested in seeing them shoeplay. It's a lot different than a TS or CD situation for sure, but I'd still be wondering "how much are those feet affected by those male genetics?". On a related note, what people don't seem to get, when they argue in favor of TS shoeplay, is the fact that no matter how much they identify as a woman, the overall anatomy is still male, and thus those are still a man's feet. Again I say, if that's what a person is into then have at it. But don't try to convince the rest of us that we should look at it the same.

OceanWaves3947
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2017 11:19 am

Re: Would you be willing to watch a genetically male woman shoeplay?

Post by OceanWaves3947 » Tue Aug 14, 2018 8:44 pm

Actually, I’m not that much into male shoeplay. And in no way am I trying to convince anyone here to be into it. I’m just sharing my opinions on the matter. Personally, I would feel less attracted to a woman’s shoeplay if I found out that she was transgender (that she used to have a male body, and then transitioned). However, if she has Swyer syndrome or something like it, and, therefore, has had a female-looking body all her life, and only some (from an attractiveness perspective) scientific technicalities, such as the fact that she has a Y chromosome and lacks a functioning uterus, are all that differentiate her from a normal woman, then I personally wouldn’t mind.
Of course, you’re all entitled to your opinions. I’m aware that everyone has different tastes, and in no way am I trying to convince anyone else to agree with me. It’s a free world, especially on an issue as deeply personal as this, after all.

notalwaysright10000
Posts: 478
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 1:12 am

Re: Would you be willing to watch a genetically male woman shoeplay?

Post by notalwaysright10000 » Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:06 am

It's not that the issue is personal, it's just that you're in the wrong place. :sorry: That's what I intended my golf course analogy to illustrate. If you look at my comment history I get even more annoyed with people who post pages of pictures of pretty girls with no feet showing. And I certainly don't mind seeing pretty girls - It's just that I come here for a specific niche interest.
Uh, OK, what should I write here...
Sweet and to the point:
My strong preference is for seated, both-feet shoeplay. Dangling, and shoeplay with open-toed shoes or mules, I'm afraid don't do as much for me.

User avatar
nyllover
Admin
Admin
Posts: 7320
Joined: Sat May 24, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: Italy (Tuscany)
Contact:

Re: Would you be willing to watch a genetically male woman shoeplay?

Post by nyllover » Wed Aug 15, 2018 10:57 am

Guys, please stop being so homophobic (or something like that). I would say he is in the wrong place if he would start POSTING those pics without first asking, but he is just trying to have a polite exchange of opinions.
No reason to be so angry with him or, basically, kick him out.

I am actually a bit unsure on this one. On one hand, of course, the whole idea of male shoeplay or anyway any sort of male foot sex act disgusts me even more than looking at two guys fucking. On the other hand, I do understand here we are talking of a situation where you wouldn't probably even KNOW they have male genetics unless you'd ask them. And that's a totally different question.

On another note, in my Feet4Cash network we do have a tgirls/shemale foot fetish site (because it sells and we have a photographer who knows how to shoot those pics and vids) and, although the vast majority of that content totally disgusts me... there ARE some tgirls that do look totally like girls, and actually have pretty feet. It's rare (very rare) and I'm not saying I would be involved in any sort of sexual activity with them knowing their nature...but what if I wouldn't know?

What if She looks like a girl, She dresses like a girl, She has pretty feet and you don't know?

And what if... let's say... not knowing she's a tgirl (or those this thread is about) you end up having the best footjob ever from her...and only after you discover her nature? I think I would ask for another one :)

I'm an open-minded person, totally open-minded, and I do understand the situation would be at least peculiar. Things are never just black and white.

P.S. I would NOT tolerate ANY other homophobic or nasty comment here. If this disturbs you, move on and don't read this topic. I fucking HATE people who try to isolate homosexual people just because they have different sexual nature. And I will NOT tolerate ANY sort of comment like that here.
Click here to see the best footfetish network.

User avatar
stewdredd
Posts: 195
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 8:17 pm

Re: Would you be willing to watch a genetically male woman shoeplay?

Post by stewdredd » Wed Aug 15, 2018 12:09 pm

I don't think anyone here is being homophobic but I think there are enough sexy female feet and foot play out there for any straight male to stray beyond that. Again it has nothing to do with homophobia...let me put it this way...You'll NEVER find me watching two males having sex or doing any form of foot play...that doesn't mean I have a problem with them.

User avatar
Footsiefreak
Posts: 3385
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 8:01 am

Re: Would you be willing to watch a genetically male woman shoeplay?

Post by Footsiefreak » Thu Oct 18, 2018 2:53 pm

No I have no interest in that start your own site for that kind of material

Nylover no one is being transgenderphobic its just a preference. Besides you consider male to female footsie disgusting

Just as I prefer hose and no tattoos while others prefer something different

User avatar
christo
Posts: 1088
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:34 pm
Location: Pantyhose Planet
Contact:

Re: Would you be willing to watch a genetically male woman shoeplay?

Post by christo » Mon Nov 12, 2018 5:01 am

OceanWaves3947 wrote:
Tue Aug 14, 2018 8:44 pm
Actually, I’m not that much into male shoeplay. And in no way am I trying to convince anyone here to be into it. I’m just sharing my opinions on the matter. Personally, I would feel less attracted to a woman’s shoeplay if I found out that she was transgender (that she used to have a male body, and then transitioned). However, if she has Swyer syndrome or something like it, and, therefore, has had a female-looking body all her life, and only some (from an attractiveness perspective) scientific technicalities, such as the fact that she has a Y chromosome and lacks a functioning uterus, are all that differentiate her from a normal woman, then I personally wouldn’t mind.
Of course, you’re all entitled to your opinions. I’m aware that everyone has different tastes, and in no way am I trying to convince anyone else to agree with me. It’s a free world, especially on an issue as deeply personal as this, after all.
Dude I know exactly what you are talking about. These are people with whom you'd see in public you be mind blown to know they were born male. They spend most of their life as the female. You can find a lot of them on Pornhub and without the cock reveal you wouldn't know otherwise. I am not attracted to men but these are sexy and most have very sexy feet. So I feel ya.
http://soledivine.freeforums.org
Home for candid pantyhose feet!
Registration is closed!!!!!

notalwaysright10000
Posts: 478
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 1:12 am

Re: Would you be willing to watch a genetically male woman shoeplay?

Post by notalwaysright10000 » Mon Nov 12, 2018 11:30 pm

"These are people with whom you'd see in public you be mind blown to know they were born male. "

Nope. I can always tell, and very easily at that. Indeed it's so effortless for me it's almost analogous to being one of just a few people in the world without prosopagnosia.

For instance, not only are almost all so-called "candid" shoeplay clip stores full of staged fakes, for some reason they use almost all transgender models, and I seem to be the only person who's noticed this -or anyway the only one who's remarked upon it.
(To be honest I don't expect this observation to be well-received. As Mark Twain said it's a lot easier to fool people than to convince them they've been fooled.)
Uh, OK, what should I write here...
Sweet and to the point:
My strong preference is for seated, both-feet shoeplay. Dangling, and shoeplay with open-toed shoes or mules, I'm afraid don't do as much for me.

Mr. Mike
Posts: 1414
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 4:54 pm

Re: Would you be willing to watch a genetically male woman shoeplay?

Post by Mr. Mike » Tue Nov 13, 2018 12:15 am

Come on Notalways...go by your name. You are very adamant about things...there is no 100% in anything. You can be fooled, there is just no way to prove it. There are places in the world I'm sure you haven't been to where you could be fooled... Adams Apple, posture, or whatever....

notalwaysright10000
Posts: 478
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 1:12 am

Re: Would you be willing to watch a genetically male woman shoeplay?

Post by notalwaysright10000 » Tue Nov 13, 2018 12:32 am

"You can be fooled, there is just no way to prove it"

Taken to its logical extreme, you could apply exactly the same reasoning to argue that there exist store mannequins that I would be unable to tell from stationary people. And the exact same rebuttal would apply: I see so many that are so easy to spot that it is entirely reasonable to assume that any hypothetical subset I'm unable to spot is either very small in number -or simply nonexistent.

As it stands, trans women are rather like toupees, inasmuch as I remain to be convinced that there exist any that are capable of fooling me.
Uh, OK, what should I write here...
Sweet and to the point:
My strong preference is for seated, both-feet shoeplay. Dangling, and shoeplay with open-toed shoes or mules, I'm afraid don't do as much for me.

User avatar
christo
Posts: 1088
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:34 pm
Location: Pantyhose Planet
Contact:

Re: Would you be willing to watch a genetically male woman shoeplay?

Post by christo » Wed Nov 14, 2018 5:25 am

notalwaysright10000 wrote:
Tue Nov 13, 2018 12:32 am
"You can be fooled, there is just no way to prove it"

Taken to its logical extreme, you could apply exactly the same reasoning to argue that there exist store mannequins that I would be unable to tell from stationary people. And the exact same rebuttal would apply: I see so many that are so easy to spot that it is entirely reasonable to assume that any hypothetical subset I'm unable to spot is either very small in number -or simply nonexistent.

As it stands, trans women are rather like toupees, inasmuch as I remain to be convinced that there exist any that are capable of fooling me.
I am telling you right now you would be deceived. Seeing them pass you in public and you would'nt know they were born male. To think you can instantly see right through it proves to me you have no idea as to what you are talking about.
Here is one example.
https://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php? ... y=67363962
http://soledivine.freeforums.org
Home for candid pantyhose feet!
Registration is closed!!!!!

notalwaysright10000
Posts: 478
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 1:12 am

Re: Would you be willing to watch a genetically male woman shoeplay?

Post by notalwaysright10000 » Wed Nov 14, 2018 3:16 pm

I happen to live in Los Angeles, so I have quite a good idea of how many I walk by on the street. And your example backfired spectacularly, if judged on the criterion of whether I find it convincing. Not only can I very easily tell that the person in that video was born male, I am sincerely amazed that anyone would have the slightest difficulty in doing so. This is exactly what my prosopagnosia analogy was meant to illustrate. (I would hesitate to say any of this if Pornhub had a comments section, but as it's unlikely that the trans woman in that video will be harassed by anyone as a result of this conversation I'll be blunt.)
To cite other specific examples, the sites Norcalfeet and Allyoucnfeet dishonestly use all trans models without being up front about this, and though many of them are far more convincing than the person in the video you linked it is nonetheless glaringly obvious to me.

I feel the need to reiterate an earlier disclaimer: I have nothing whatsoever against trans women. But I most definitely do have something against being bullshitted. To draw another analogy, if you try to serve me horse meat in a restaurant under the pretense that it's veal, you have no business taking offense if I figure out what you're up to and choose to say so openly.
Uh, OK, what should I write here...
Sweet and to the point:
My strong preference is for seated, both-feet shoeplay. Dangling, and shoeplay with open-toed shoes or mules, I'm afraid don't do as much for me.

Post Reply