Where Have all the Candid Shoeplay sites gone?

[N0t4WOrk]

It's like a desert online. A Goddamned desert. Ten or even five years ago I found candid shoeplay videos everywhere. Pornhub, Clips4Sale.com, Feetvidz, even YouTube. Now you have to download these videos from an obscure website somewheres. If you're lucky they have an old-school site format in which you pay by Paypal/Credit Card, but they have limited variety, nothing really new. On the other hand, we have really weird sites that ask for bitcoin, and $30 donations in order for you to even see the merchandise! Arrgh!

Could someone please compile a list of good sites that have shoeplay something like feetvidz and pornhub.com? Or new sites that are similar to Clips4Sale?

[nyllover]

You can thank Visa and Mastercard for this. They are the companies that basically set the rules on what can or can't be sold online, and about a year ago they decided that ANY person showing up on a video should be registered on the site the video is sold as a content creator.
And what's worse, they made it clear that they would have removed the permission to use Visa or Mastercard for the WHOLE site that was hosting any of these videos. As you can imagine, that's why all the clipstores removed the candid videos.

I highly doubt you will find Candid Shoeplay on sites that are not "weird"...because only "weird" payment solutions can be used for candid videos.

[JWCooley126]

It's tough going for us for sure. I do remember the good old days where there were candid shoeplay videos all over the internet. Feetvidz was great too, but I think they got shut down over kiddie porn smh.

[tobydole]

You have to navigate a plethora of Discord servers, many of which are no longer active. And most people are asking for money, but due to the amount of stealing and trading going on I don't blame people. Everything is kind of on the DL. As a result of trading vids a lot of us no longer share anymore, or only share with trusted people anyway. If you're not a capturer yourself it's basically impossible for people to trust you (which is where stealing and trading comes in ) You might get lucky in a server for a while but eventually it too will die. Same story every time.

Good luck.

[pumplover]

It's such a shame that it has come to this. I don't know about you all, but whenever I get the chance, I'm trying to archive as much of the actual candid content that is still somehow by a miracle of sorts sitting around on YouTube. I feel like one day it will all just disappear too. One of my many goals is to get it archived, sorted and then be able to share it will all of you to have your own copies. Everyone, if you have the ability (and storage) - when you see genuine candid shoeplay, save it!

[MelFresh]

Well, the proper question is what happened with their authors. Some of C4Sale channels were profitable businesses. I'm sure that their owners are not happy because of of the closures. Do they really did nothing to continue it? It's a little strange that any idea how to bypass Visa and Mastercard policies was not implemented among them.

[nyllover]

Well, the proper question is what happened with their authors. Some of C4Sale channels were profitable businesses. I'm sure that their owners are not happy because of of the closures. Do they really did nothing to continue it? It's a little strange that any idea how to bypass Visa and Mastercard policies was not implemented among them.

Well, some of them did. But the only way to bypass Visa and Mastercard is the "really weird sites that ask for bitcoin, and $30 donations" the post author was speaking about.

[assy]

Good riddance to the candid stores. Filming people without their consent and then selling the content for money is illegal in many jurisdictions. Google Molka to see where this road leads to.

[ShoeplayJ]

Sorry, man. For all the reasons Nyllover said, it's basically a black market unfortunately. Some of the old producers/distributors are still filming and selling "underground" but it's a matter of not only finding where they are but also being willing to use whatever wonky payment methods are available since anything regarding Visa and Mastercard is out of the question.

Also, take a shot for every time we've had this discussion since the purge lol.

[paradigm88]

Good riddance to the candid stores. Filming people without their consent and then selling the content for money is illegal in many jurisdictions.

Fair point. But at the same time, candid content was something of a gateway drug for many of us who were primarily into feet and shoeplay. Posed content, even content that was foot-heavy, always seemed to trend toward the mainstream. Probably because lingerie and nude photos made way more money than a girl sitting shoeless in a library. I won't pretend to know the business model of it all.

It doesn't make it right, and it doesn't negate the questionable ethics of candid video. (And in a lot of ways, the "exposure" of candid content probably does more harm for foot fetishists in the PR department.) But it's important to acknowledge why some of us pine for that era.

[formerlyknownasE]

Good riddance to the candid stores. Filming people without their consent and then selling the content for money is illegal in many jurisdictions. Google Molka to see where this road leads to.

Oh cry me a river, it's literally just feet, you are not filming anything forbidden, now each candid filmer has their own house rules as I don't get faces because I'm have no clue who's watching my videos and I'm not in the business of showing faces to random people. But I googled Molka and that's not even remotely similar, that's filming people in bathrooms and motels, places with a reasonable expectation of privacy, not in a public setting.

As for the methods, I use cashapp or paypal, those are the methods I'm willing to accept and I am not even going to try to use visa or mastercard nor I'm interested in using crypto.

[nyllover]

Good riddance to the candid stores. Filming people without their consent and then selling the content for money is illegal in many jurisdictions. Google Molka to see where this road leads to.

Oh cry me a river, it's literally just feet, you are not filming anything forbidden

I agree 100% with you when the videos don't show the people faces. At that degree, candid videos should be 100% allowed to be sold online with no limitations. Visa and Mastercard went way out of line defining the new laws and, believe me, they come out with new ones EVERY SINGLE DAY. Did you know that now, on our Feet4Cash sites, we can't even have a girl who is sleeping while the other is worshipping her feet? Totally crazy.

[Leopard]

World is definately going in a shit direction! They show all types of sex in tv even explicit which even kids can watch, but candid feet are illegal.... make sense!!

Good riddance to the candid stores. Filming people without their consent and then selling the content for money is illegal in many jurisdictions. Google Molka to see where this road leads to.

Oh cry me a river, it's literally just feet, you are not filming anything forbidden

I agree 100% with you when the videos don't show the people faces. At that degree, candid videos should be 100% allowed to be sold online with no limitations. Visa and Mastercard went way out of line defining the new laws and, believe me, they come out with new ones EVERY SINGLE DAY. Did you know that now, on our Feet4Cash sites, we can't even have a girl who is sleeping while the other is worshipping her feet? Totally crazy.

[Collegetownstudios]

$30 donations in order for you to even see the merchandise!

If you mean my website, I;ve got a lot of previews on the videos. But I am working on getting a preview for every video. Lol.

[ShoeplayJ]

Good riddance to the candid stores. Filming people without their consent and then selling the content for money is illegal in many jurisdictions. Google Molka to see where this road leads to.

Oh cry me a river, it's literally just feet, you are not filming anything forbidden, now each candid filmer has their own house rules as I don't get faces because I'm have no clue who's watching my videos and I'm not in the business of showing faces to random people. But I googled Molka and that's not even remotely similar, that's filming people in bathrooms and motels, places with a reasonable expectation of privacy, not in a public setting.

THANK YOU. Everything sounds dirty and sinister with enough mental gymnastics, especially when you liken it to something actually bad such as Molka, which is effectively a Peeping Tom with several extra steps. I've literally never seen that in the 20 years I've been roaming these sites and stores and I've seen many. Molka constitues literally invading women's private spaces to film them; I've seen cases of victims finding creeps filming outside their windows or finding cameras in their bedrooms, or couples finding hidden cameras in their hotel rooms after being intimate and so many other frightening scenarios. See, THAT's fucked up. THAT's predatory. THAT's disgusting. Nobody here is asking for that shit. And like you said, candids are done in public settings where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy AND....it's literally just their feet. We're not doing upskirts here...
I'd say the most fucked up things about candid shoeplay videos is that the faces are never cut or blurred —thereby posing the risk of humiliating the subjects if the material falls into the wrong hands— and things get really iffy when we talk about selling this stuff. The former can at least be easily remedied.

[ShoeplayJ]

Good riddance to the candid stores. Filming people without their consent and then selling the content for money is illegal in many jurisdictions. Google Molka to see where this road leads to.

Oh cry me a river, it's literally just feet, you are not filming anything forbidden

I agree 100% with you when the videos don't show the people faces.At that degree, candid videos should be 100% allowed to be sold online with no limitations. Visa and Mastercard went way out of line defining the new laws and, believe me, they come out with new ones EVERY SINGLE DAY. Did you know that now, on our Feet4Cash sites, we can't even have a girl who is sleeping while the other is worshipping her feet? Totally crazy.

Exactly. But see, everyone started demanding faceshots because a few people fell for men larping as women on YouTube once upon a time and became paranoid lol. I know that's not the only reason, but it certainly was a significant one. That demand ultimately contributed to the candid "industry's" undoing at the end of the day. And yeah Visa and Mastercard have totally lost it. C4S has become super strict and over the top now because of it. Trying to upload anything to any of these adult tube sites requires several steps of ID confirmation now. I had to pull several videos from C4S because there were people off in the distance of certain shots. You'd never be able to identify these people even if you had CSI's or NCIS' level of technology but yet because we couldn't provide any "consent" for their "performance", the videos got rejected. Fucking madness

[assy]

The problem is CONSENT. If you don't have it, you have no business monetising it. Filming without consent and then selling for money is giving a fuck about how that person would feel about it and illegal in many countries on top of it.

The fact that it is so casually brushed aside as long as you make money from a bunch of wankers explains a lot why women are still treated like shit in many instances. It is NOT OKAY.

With regards to Molka - the term refers to "sneaky camera". Candids definitley fall under this, and people DID position hidden cameras under chairs or in changing rooms to capture feet (and God knows what else - there are dozens of candids of minors' feet on youtube clearly aimed at the fetish audience as well as on some vendor's site, and quite a few snuck in an upskirt shot if they could get one (when when filming under the table in a library). The fact that you have to hide what you are doing should give you pause for thought.

[suarez7]

When I walk down a public street I haven't given my consent to be filmed by the numerous CCTV and security cameras, but I'm still caught on tape, what's the difference

[nyllover]

When I walk down a public street I haven't given my consent to be filmed by the numerous CCTV and security cameras, but I'm still caught on tape, what's the difference

The difference is that no one is monetizing those videos AND those videos are only used in very specific situations, when a crime is involved.

[suarez7]

But how do we know that whoever is recording is not selling that footage of us without us knowing. Would if even suprise you if they were, after all companies have been selling people's data for years to third parties largely without the consumers consent. Furthermore let's take Google maps for example have I given them permission to drive past my house and record and publish that or have numerous people on Street view given there consent, and yes they may blue the faces but in many candids people don't even show the face let alone blur it. Google makes money off Google maps yet technically speaking that is exactly like candid content, since the people involved are likely to be unaware that have bee filmed/pictured. If your talking about monertization that what about the countless YouTube vlog channels where they might go abroad and film the scenery again catching unsuspecting people in the background but making money of there content. What about the website earthcam that has webcams of different cities and locations around the world, that makes money, but again many people are unsuspectingly caught on camera, they make money. I'm not trying to be argumentive I'm just pointing out the inconsistencies, I think candids at most are unethical imo not illegal, unless it's a minor that if being filmed, to then sell that for nefarious reasons.