AI Generated foot fetish pictures (with prompts!)

[pumplover]

Somehow....I got it to do one shoe off and one on.....

In an airport, a flight attendant sits waiting in the gate area for her next flight. Her legs are crossed and she is looking at her smartphone. Her uniform is red, and she wears pantyhose. The floor is carpeted. The flight attendant wears no shoes. A pair of black high heels lies on the floor beside her. Her rolling suitcase is on the floor beside her.

[Mr. Mike]

𝐃𝐨 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐞 𝐝𝐨 𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐨𝐬? 𝐀 𝐝𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐛𝐞 𝐬𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐭

[nyllover]

𝐃𝐨 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐞 𝐝𝐨 𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐨𝐬? 𝐀 𝐝𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐛𝐞 𝐬𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐭

We are not quite there yet with the video generation tools... you CAN have some luck if you feed them with a dangling photo...but we are quite far from making videos we can enjoy

[ismaltese]

The last ones were cool, but there is something strange in this application.
I tried your exact prompts, but my ladies have always their shoes on! I mean a pair of empty shoes lies on the floor, but they wear another pair. It is as if my images are censored :-O

[pumplover]

The last ones were cool, but there is something strange in this application.
I tried your exact prompts, but my ladies have always their shoes on! I mean a pair of empty shoes lies on the floor, but they wear another pair. It is as if my images are censored :-O

are you on free sub? or paid? also, it took me about 6 or 7 tries to get that result.

[nyllover]

The last ones were cool, but there is something strange in this application.
I tried your exact prompts, but my ladies have always their shoes on! I mean a pair of empty shoes lies on the floor, but they wear another pair. It is as if my images are censored :-O

AI generators are, often, kinda unpredictable. Especially if you use them for free. It takes a few attempts to get exactly what you want.
Sometimes they offer a way to modify an existing image (you upload the photo, select the area to modify, write the prompt) and that improves things...but it's rarely free

[ismaltese]

Right, I am using a free account. Actually you were right that - giving again the same exact prompt - one out of 4 photo showed the woman feet.

[vice versa 1]

Ideogram.
Prompt: 3 25-year-old women sitting on a big french sofa louis XV style. They wear dresses marie-antoinette style. they wear thin blue thigh-high stockings with lace top. they dont wear shoes.
Result:

[ismaltese]

My best result so far. Funny the dress of the second picture ... I didn't ask for that :-D

[nyllover]

Hot stuff guys...hot stuff.

[AnonymousPasser]

For images to be perfectly reproducible on each attempt, aside from prompts you need to also feed the same settings and, the most important part, seed value. Seed is a number which will determine noise patterns that form an image at the end. By default, each time seed is randomly generated, that's why results are different on the same prompt. You can experiment with same seeds which gave good results and different prompts and/or settings.

[pumplover]

My best result so far. Funny the dress of the second picture ... I didn't ask for that :-D

Screenshot 2024-10-17 at 19.17.08.png
Screenshot 2024-10-17 at 19.17.16.png

There was a woman I worked with at one point who did exactly like the first pic every single meeting. Days long gone.....

[nyllover]

Since church is where my love for shoeplay started, I knew I had to make something with that kind of scene. I'm trying variations of the "no shoes" thing - but I figured out I could have the mom's high heels on the floor beside her purse, so it looks like she took them off for the service, to show off her hosed feet for anyone to see. The potential really is unlimited.

The other trick I found is to make use of the negative prompts. In ideogram you just type the statement in the form of a sentence (according to the main dev when asked about it on the Discord) - like "There are distorted faces". You type the descriptor in a positive fashion in the negative prompt box and it does the opposite (or it's supposed to). But I believe it only puts aside 200 tokens for that box, so the important details you need to have at the beginning of the statement.

Also, sorry to have multiple posts in a short period of time...just kept having these aha! moments to share.

Looks like someone is lurking this forum to steal the photos and repost them for his own purposes. Of course without any reference to the source.



How about we ALL report this a**hole to Facebook, for posting adult content?

[Xzzzy]

Realistically, there is no definition of "adult content" that includes seeing a fully dressed woman with her shoes off. Your personal intent or motivation doesn't matter. If you can literally walk into a church and see it out in the open, it's not porn. And Facebook will agree.

[pumplover]

Since church is where my love for shoeplay started, I knew I had to make something with that kind of scene. I'm trying variations of the "no shoes" thing - but I figured out I could have the mom's high heels on the floor beside her purse, so it looks like she took them off for the service, to show off her hosed feet for anyone to see. The potential really is unlimited.

The other trick I found is to make use of the negative prompts. In ideogram you just type the statement in the form of a sentence (according to the main dev when asked about it on the Discord) - like "There are distorted faces". You type the descriptor in a positive fashion in the negative prompt box and it does the opposite (or it's supposed to). But I believe it only puts aside 200 tokens for that box, so the important details you need to have at the beginning of the statement.

Also, sorry to have multiple posts in a short period of time...just kept having these aha! moments to share.

Looks like someone is lurking this forum to steal the photos and repost them for his own purposes. Of course without any reference to the source.



How about we ALL report this a**hole to Facebook, for posting adult content?

I guess I 'll need to put something like "Pumplover AI Fantasies" or something on stuff from now on. LOL

It's ok Nyllover. I appreciate the feelings on it, but I'll let him have the freebie this time. I mean, I'm just putting words into a prompt and hoping for a good result. If dude has to rely on fake social media credit to fulfill his need for attention and affirmation, then him grabbing that pic and using it is the least troubling thing about his life.

[passion4nylons]

My best result so far. Funny the dress of the second picture ... I didn't ask for that :-D

Screenshot 2024-10-17 at 19.17.08.png
Screenshot 2024-10-17 at 19.17.16.png

In picture 2 the legs are swapped looks a bit spooky.

[ismaltese]

My best result so far. Funny the dress of the second picture ... I didn't ask for that :-D

Screenshot 2024-10-17 at 19.17.08.png
Screenshot 2024-10-17 at 19.17.16.png

In picture 2 the legs are swapped looks a bit spooky.

Ah ah you're right. I didn't noticed it. And it was one of the best :-D

[nyllover]

Realistically, there is no definition of "adult content" that includes seeing a fully dressed woman with her shoes off. Your personal intent or motivation doesn't matter. If you can literally walk into a church and see it out in the open, it's not porn. And Facebook will agree.

Well, unfortunately what you say is wrong. I fight every day with the censorship of places like Instagram, where our company account has been banned 6 times already for "adult content", and all we were posting were feet photos.

Feet are considered adult content by these companies filters....they know what we get off with... ))

[Xzzzy]

Are you suggesting that if I post family photos from Thanksgiving, and there's a fifteen year old girl in nylon feet sitting on a couch with her grandpa watching Planes Trains & Automobiles, Facebook will delete the photo and report me for child erotica? How is a photo of an forty year old woman sitting in church with her shoes off any different?

[nyllover]

Are you suggesting that if I post family photos from Thanksgiving, and there's a fifteen year old girl in nylon feet sitting on a couch with her grandpa watching Planes Trains & Automobiles, Facebook will delete the photo and report me for child erotica? How is a photo of an forty year old woman sitting in church with her shoes off any different?

Let's don't fool ourselves here guys. We MASTURBATE with these photos, so I am not sure how could anyone be "ok" with a child being in the photo.

Of course, these are AI generated images, so that's a different story (because the child isn't the focus anyway).

But, again, wouldn't harm to try if using pets instead of kids would produce good results anyway.