Accidentally find candid shoeplay videos (others not)

ismaltese · Post by **ismaltese** » Sat Oct 18, 2014 8:03 am

Mr. Mike wrote: If you can see my attachment and if you are subscribed to me, you can see I add "timestamps" on my videos.

Hi Mike, I'm subscribed to your channel but I cannot see your attachments.

MM12 · Post by **MM12** » Sat Oct 18, 2014 1:41 pm

ismaltese wrote:
Mr. Mike wrote: If you can see my attachment and if you are subscribed to me, you can see I add "timestamps" on my videos.
Hi Mike, I'm subscribed to your channel but I cannot see your attachments.

Me as well

Mr. Mike · Post by **Mr. Mike** » Sat Oct 18, 2014 4:38 pm

I dont know why. If you are subscribed to me, you should be able to see all my playlists...I show it as "public"

Mr. Mike · Post by **Mr. Mike** » Sun Oct 19, 2014 6:58 am

Quick dip about 3:40

redl20 · Post by **redl20** » Fri Oct 24, 2014 3:02 pm

Constant dipping / heel off within the first minutes!

Mr. Mike · Post by **Mr. Mike** » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:48 am

hat was almst the greatest video ever. If she couldve been a speaker for about :30....would have been epic!

redl20 wrote:Constant dipping / heel off within the first minutes!

MDEEM · Post by **MDEEM** » Thu Oct 30, 2014 3:04 am

looks like there's new shoeplayers at BSU..

2:29, one girl has shoes off; she put them back on down the vid just to take em off again..
24:10 - black girl cross legged shoeplay (keep an eye on her, the previous meeting she shoeplayed also..) she plays off and on until the end
1:34:49 - girl in pink heels heelpops, other girl has her one foot out the flats for a few seconds..

so far that's all I've seen.

MDEEM · Post by **MDEEM** » Thu Oct 30, 2014 3:24 am

SGA shoeplay..

38:54 black girl on the left starts her shoeplay with dangling; when they scroll back to her she's doing cross legged play; natasha would be proud...

albert79 · Post by **albert79** » Sat Nov 01, 2014 10:16 pm

MDEEM wrote:

looks like there's new shoeplayers at BSU..

2:29, one girl has shoes off; she put them back on down the vid just to take em off again..
24:10 - black girl cross legged shoeplay (keep an eye on her, the previous meeting she shoeplayed also..) she plays off and on until the end
1:34:49 - girl in pink heels heelpops, other girl has her one foot out the flats for a few seconds..

so far that's all I've seen.

1:48:23 same black girl heel popping

albert79 · Post by **albert79** » Sat Nov 01, 2014 10:34 pm

MDEEM wrote:

SGA shoeplay..

38:54 black girl on the left starts her shoeplay with dangling; when they scroll back to her she's doing cross legged play; natasha would be proud...

some more scenes of this girl in this video:
51:12 (dangling with loosing flat)
57:45
1:04:24

In the same video:
1:03:00 (left girl with glasses little heelpopping)
1:07:55 (blond girl little shoeplay)

By the way I follow this "BSU SGA" videos on youtube the last 2 years. There was many shoeplay. If you want I can post the time stamps.

albert79 · Post by **albert79** » Sat Nov 01, 2014 10:44 pm

51:56 black girl dangling
59:03 dangling (see left corner below)
59:24 heelpopping

albert79 · Post by **albert79** » Sat Nov 01, 2014 11:03 pm

13:13 blond girl shoes off

albert79 · Post by **albert79** » Sat Nov 01, 2014 11:12 pm

15:34 girl on the left with glasses little dangling
17:33 / 23:30 same girl dipping
19:58 / 21:16 girl on the rigth with glasses little heelpopping

notalwaysright10000 · Post by **notalwaysright10000** » Sun Nov 02, 2014 1:08 am

Alright, there is this nitwit on youtube who recycles other people's content and discoveries on his own channel, including many videos in this thread, WITH NAMES OF THE WOMEN AND EVEN LINKS TO THE ORIGINAL VIDEOS! There is a high probability that this guy is chiefly responsible for Ana Kasparian's abrupt cessation of what had hitherto been consistent shoeplay, and now that for the the fifth time a find of mine from this thread has showed up on his channel -once again with links- my patience is at an end.

And just to be clear, DanglingFan if you are reading this none of my ire is directed at you, for three all important reasons:

1) You have been quite reasonable when spoken to, and adequately *discreet* in contrast to this twit

2) Unlike him much of your content is your own discovery, or taken from movies and TV shows

3)You don't link the original Youtube videos where doing so would be unwise, and most importantly don't jeopardize future potential with reckless behavior

But this other guy has now made at least one enemy, and hopefully many more.

footlover112 · Post by **footlover112** » Sun Nov 02, 2014 2:44 am

notalwaysright10000 wrote:Alright, there is this nitwit on youtube who recycles other people's content and discoveries on his own channel, including many videos in this thread, WITH NAMES OF THE WOMEN AND EVEN LINKS TO THE ORIGINAL VIDEOS! There is a high probability that this guy is chiefly responsible for Ana Kasparian's abrupt cessation of what had hitherto been consistent shoeplay, and now that for the the fifth time a find of mine from this thread has showed up on his channel -once again with links- my patience is at an end.

And just to be clear, DanglingFan if you are reading this none of my ire is directed at you, for three all important reasons:

1) You have been quite reasonable when spoken to, and adequately *discreet* in contrast to this twit

2) Unlike him much of your content is your own discovery, or taken from movies and TV shows

3)You don't link the original Youtube videos where doing so would be unwise, and most importantly don't jeopardize future potential with reckless behavior

But this other guy has now made at least one enemy, and hopefully many more.

Why don't you just state the persons name who is responsible?

notalwaysright10000 · Post by **notalwaysright10000** » Sun Nov 02, 2014 2:53 am

Happily. I meant to provide a link. It's this idiot:

kruskaru · Post by **kruskaru** » Sun Nov 02, 2014 6:32 am

- at 15:50

GadFly · Post by **GadFly** » Sun Nov 02, 2014 3:33 pm

notalwaysright10000 wrote:Happily. I meant to provide a link. It's this idiot:

What's the problem with this? He's posting your finds? You have no more claim to these videos than he does.

paradigm88 · Post by **paradigm88** » Sun Nov 02, 2014 5:54 pm

I think it's less about reposting the finds as it is sharing the links, commenting on people featured within them, and so on.

That's why I'm often hesitant to formally follow/subscribe to the channels I watch. It's one thing if it's a notable celebrity; they're at least somewhat likely to fall on someone's radar eventually. But for videos like this - where we're largely dependent on the natural happenstance that results in shoeplay, it's better that we stay off the grid in that sense, better that less attention is drawn to it.

notalwaysright10000 · Post by **notalwaysright10000** » Sun Nov 02, 2014 8:09 pm

"What's the problem with this? He's posting your finds? You have no more claim to these videos than he does."

Unequivocally clear and straightforward English prose is never good enough for people like you; you'll just invent a pretext to misread it.
I couldn't care less about being credited. My actual reasons have already been stated. Moreover, this has nothing to do with "rights". (And I wouldn't name yourself after Socrates if I were you; your questioning method is far from Socratic.)

"it's better that we stay off the grid in that sense, better that less attention is drawn to it."

Precisely!
This is attracting wholly unnecessary attention, for no real benefit. His posts are redundant at best. Anyone who doesn't already know about this site and this thread isn't looking hard enough, doesn't want to find very badly, and thus frankly doesn't deserve to know about it.

Oh, and as for this chuckleheaded implication that I'm all butthurt over credit for "my" finds being stolen, no no. The only reason I post here at all is out of a sense of obligation.
This thread is so great because it allows us to combine our searching resources and aggregate more finds than any one of us could possibly find on his own.

But alas there's a "freeloader" problem, similar to that you get in (say) an apartment building with "free" electricity. It's in the interest of the tenants *as a group* not to flagrantly waste electricity, or eventually the additional costs will get so out of hand they'll be factored into the rent and everybody will have to pay more. *However* it's in the interest of any one individual tenant to carelessly waste as much electricity as he pleases because his one unit is unlikely to significantly effect the overall bill. (Google "tragedy of commons", and "common knowledge in game theory".)

I post here because I don't want to be that jerk who leaves his lights and TV on for two weeks straight when he goes out of town because he thinks "Meh, screw it, I'm not paying for it".
That, and there's just the good old fashioned altruistic pleasure of sharing something other people might enjoy.

Speaking of which, I wonder, what are the odds this guy's channel is *monetized*? I didn't see any adds because my adblock is functioning but I've got a hunch...