Ambigous shoeplay sightings
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Posts: 663
- Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 2:12 am
Ambigous shoeplay sightings
Does anyone else here spend comsiderable free time scouring videos and tv shows that have a desk or table on the set, in order to seek out "inadvertant shoeplay?
More to the point of this post, are you frequently frustrated when a celebrity you've been following "appears to perhaps be doing some shoe play, but the quality of vodeo or camera angle make it maddeningly impossible to tell for sure either way? I could name (and I guess post links) to dozens if not hundreds of such examples.
"If only the set weren't so dark!"
"If only the camers didn't cut away at that exact moment!"
"Please tell me there's a place in hell specifically reserved for whoever came up with that fu**ing banner!"
I'd just like to see if this frustrates anyone else as much as it does me.
More to the point of this post, are you frequently frustrated when a celebrity you've been following "appears to perhaps be doing some shoe play, but the quality of vodeo or camera angle make it maddeningly impossible to tell for sure either way? I could name (and I guess post links) to dozens if not hundreds of such examples.
"If only the set weren't so dark!"
"If only the camers didn't cut away at that exact moment!"
"Please tell me there's a place in hell specifically reserved for whoever came up with that fu**ing banner!"
I'd just like to see if this frustrates anyone else as much as it does me.
Uh, OK, what should I write here...
Sweet and to the point:
My strong preference is for seated, both-feet shoeplay. Dangling, and shoeplay with open-toed shoes or mules, I'm afraid don't do as much for me.
Sweet and to the point:
My strong preference is for seated, both-feet shoeplay. Dangling, and shoeplay with open-toed shoes or mules, I'm afraid don't do as much for me.
- Dead Parrot
- Mod
- Posts: 2368
- Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2003 8:26 pm
- Location: Inactive
- Contact:
I have experienced this quite a few times.
Mostly it involves back when I used to watch TV, or in real life at a bank or some sort of customer service counter.
The hottie behind the counter would suddenly become a few inches shorter, and I KNEW she had removed at least one of her heels.
With TV it's impossible to do anything about this, but in reality if I'm not in line I can sometimes manuever into a position to see what she has done. Other times, such as at a bank, all I can do is imagine what's taking place out of view.
Live action occurrences like this used to happen often in the 80s. Now...I just have to take what I can get, and relive the glory days.
As far as TV goes I used to watch Lou Dobbs show, and although they showed a few good shots of the desk, I never saw Christine Romans ever so much as heelpop. Then when Rudi Bahktiar was a CNN anchor I'd strain my eyes the few times the camera would shoot overhead and behind her desk. Alas, nothing.
Oh well. The struggle continues. We'll win some, and we'll lose some, but we'll never stop looking.
DP
Mostly it involves back when I used to watch TV, or in real life at a bank or some sort of customer service counter.
The hottie behind the counter would suddenly become a few inches shorter, and I KNEW she had removed at least one of her heels.
With TV it's impossible to do anything about this, but in reality if I'm not in line I can sometimes manuever into a position to see what she has done. Other times, such as at a bank, all I can do is imagine what's taking place out of view.
Live action occurrences like this used to happen often in the 80s. Now...I just have to take what I can get, and relive the glory days.
As far as TV goes I used to watch Lou Dobbs show, and although they showed a few good shots of the desk, I never saw Christine Romans ever so much as heelpop. Then when Rudi Bahktiar was a CNN anchor I'd strain my eyes the few times the camera would shoot overhead and behind her desk. Alas, nothing.
Oh well. The struggle continues. We'll win some, and we'll lose some, but we'll never stop looking.
DP
Please note that I am no longer an active board member.
If you need assistance please contact Nyllover.
If you need assistance please contact Nyllover.
I just got done searching youtube. I wish a few of us could list off some things to search on youtube that yield results. Maybe I'll just try to start now. When I search...
shoeplay
dangling
panel
discussion
debate
roundtable
board meeting
town hall meeting
mock interview
practice interview
youth movement
presentation
commencement speech
these are a few frequents for inadvertant shoeplay
where do you guys search? any ideas?
the largest let down for me was marisa tomei. i was so hoping she would shoeplay but she never does. i think that photo was a fluke.
shoeplay
dangling
panel
discussion
debate
roundtable
board meeting
town hall meeting
mock interview
practice interview
youth movement
presentation
commencement speech
these are a few frequents for inadvertant shoeplay
where do you guys search? any ideas?
the largest let down for me was marisa tomei. i was so hoping she would shoeplay but she never does. i think that photo was a fluke.
Big shoeplay fan
- genesis4
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 5:18 pm
- Contact:
I think on most TV shows there are many hosts that, at least one or two times a show, made some action like dangling, dipping, or just heel-popping (If she has right shoes, obviously!)
Sadly, today there were less and less full-body shots by cameras, there are only faces close-ups or distant shots, so people like us can't see what they want!! When the scene is occuped by tables or desks, became more hard to see.
I noticed that in some TV shows where there are more full body shots, it's easy to see something interesting!
I like to think that in the future, with the growth of technology, we'll have the opportunity to choice the angle shots we prefer. This is utopia!
If only there were foot-fetish people amongst TV productor, director, cameramen......
Sadly, today there were less and less full-body shots by cameras, there are only faces close-ups or distant shots, so people like us can't see what they want!! When the scene is occuped by tables or desks, became more hard to see.
I noticed that in some TV shows where there are more full body shots, it's easy to see something interesting!
I like to think that in the future, with the growth of technology, we'll have the opportunity to choice the angle shots we prefer. This is utopia!
If only there were foot-fetish people amongst TV productor, director, cameramen......

-
- Posts: 663
- Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 2:12 am
KMFDNFAN wrote:I just got done searching youtube. I wish a few of us could list off some things to search on youtube that yield results. Maybe I'll just try to start now. When I search...
shoeplay
dangling
panel
discussion
debate
roundtable
board meeting
town hall meeting
mock interview
practice interview
youth movement
presentation
commencement speech
these are a few frequents for inadvertant shoeplay
where do you guys search? any ideas?
the largest let down for me was marisa tomei. i was so hoping she would shoeplay but she never does. i think that photo was a fluke.
Yeah, I've got a couple search ideas. The celeb shoeplay photos that constitute my only really significant contribution to this forum (remember the Sarah Silverman dipping photo?) were found by going to google images and searching [celebrity's name] + one of the following:
lunch
cafe
restaurant
spotted
seen
Oddly enough, "lunch" has proven by far rhe most fertile keyword for shoeplay potential.
Far more often than any other I've thought of, it is apt to bring up candid images of the celebrity in question in public seated at a table.
"cafe" has been a not-too-distant second.
Anyone else got any suggestions?
Uh, OK, what should I write here...
Sweet and to the point:
My strong preference is for seated, both-feet shoeplay. Dangling, and shoeplay with open-toed shoes or mules, I'm afraid don't do as much for me.
Sweet and to the point:
My strong preference is for seated, both-feet shoeplay. Dangling, and shoeplay with open-toed shoes or mules, I'm afraid don't do as much for me.
-
- Posts: 663
- Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 2:12 am
genesis4 wrote:I think on most TV shows there are many hosts that, at least one or two times a show, made some action like dangling, dipping, or just heel-popping (If she has right shoes, obviously!)
Sadly, today there were less and less full-body shots by cameras, there are only faces close-ups or distant shots, so people like us can't see what they want!! When the scene is occuped by tables or desks, became more hard to see.
I noticed that in some TV shows where there are more full body shots, it's easy to see something interesting!
I like to think that in the future, with the growth of technology, we'll have the opportunity to choice the angle shots we prefer. This is utopia!
If only there were foot-fetish people amongst TV productor, director, cameramen......
ABC's "world news now" used to be good. Often times when they'd cut in or out from commercial, there'd be a somewhat distant shot of the desk from behind. About five years ago I twice saw the anchor Lz Cho (half Asian and extremely hot, google her if you want to see what she looks like) very clearly shoeplaying.
Once she had her heels (in tan hose) both popped so far out of her pumps you'd definitely have been able to see her toes if the angle was higher.
Another time she had her ankles crossed (red slacks, white hose) and did the move where they let the back shoe drop and nudge it around with their toes in a fanning motion.
Both shots were less than five seconds but I'm 99.9% confident of what I saw.
Uh, OK, what should I write here...
Sweet and to the point:
My strong preference is for seated, both-feet shoeplay. Dangling, and shoeplay with open-toed shoes or mules, I'm afraid don't do as much for me.
Sweet and to the point:
My strong preference is for seated, both-feet shoeplay. Dangling, and shoeplay with open-toed shoes or mules, I'm afraid don't do as much for me.
-
- Posts: 663
- Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 2:12 am
How's this for odd:
One time about three years ago the anchors on ABC's overnight 'World New Now' were bantering (Taina Hernandez an some dude) and at one point the guy looks down and says, in a kind of amused/puzzled voice, "What's up with those shoes? They don't have any laces?"
She reaches down and picks up the shoe and displays it for the audience (this 2 A.M. news takes itself far less seriously than ordinary news shows).
Now here's the interesting part.
They joke around for a few more seconds and the guy says (again) "But why? Why no laces?"
She kind of shrugs and says, "It's so I can take my shoes off in public."
Now is this some kind of weak joke, or did she mean "It's so I can shoeplay"?
I'm thinking she must have had her feet popped out of her shoes for the guy to even notice, let alone comment on, the missing laces.
Anyone agree or disagree? Does this sound like wishful thinking or a logical surmise?
One time about three years ago the anchors on ABC's overnight 'World New Now' were bantering (Taina Hernandez an some dude) and at one point the guy looks down and says, in a kind of amused/puzzled voice, "What's up with those shoes? They don't have any laces?"
She reaches down and picks up the shoe and displays it for the audience (this 2 A.M. news takes itself far less seriously than ordinary news shows).
Now here's the interesting part.
They joke around for a few more seconds and the guy says (again) "But why? Why no laces?"
She kind of shrugs and says, "It's so I can take my shoes off in public."
Now is this some kind of weak joke, or did she mean "It's so I can shoeplay"?
I'm thinking she must have had her feet popped out of her shoes for the guy to even notice, let alone comment on, the missing laces.
Anyone agree or disagree? Does this sound like wishful thinking or a logical surmise?
Uh, OK, what should I write here...
Sweet and to the point:
My strong preference is for seated, both-feet shoeplay. Dangling, and shoeplay with open-toed shoes or mules, I'm afraid don't do as much for me.
Sweet and to the point:
My strong preference is for seated, both-feet shoeplay. Dangling, and shoeplay with open-toed shoes or mules, I'm afraid don't do as much for me.
- Dangling Fan
- Posts: 3578
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:27 am
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 663
- Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 2:12 am
God I agree, but in this case the guy didn't actually ruin anything, since there was no shot of behind the desk and I wouldn't have known anything if the guy didn't mention it.
But really, I'm curious to hear your interpretation of what I described.
Does "It's so I can take my shoes off in public" likely mean "It's so I can shoeplay"?
Do you agree that she most likely had her feet popped out of her shoes for the guy to even notice and comment upon the absence of laces? (these were sneakers)
I don't mean to sound obsessed with this, but in these ambiguous cases I like to seek a second opinion in order to better distinguish my own interpretation from wishful thinking.
But really, I'm curious to hear your interpretation of what I described.
Does "It's so I can take my shoes off in public" likely mean "It's so I can shoeplay"?
Do you agree that she most likely had her feet popped out of her shoes for the guy to even notice and comment upon the absence of laces? (these were sneakers)
I don't mean to sound obsessed with this, but in these ambiguous cases I like to seek a second opinion in order to better distinguish my own interpretation from wishful thinking.
Uh, OK, what should I write here...
Sweet and to the point:
My strong preference is for seated, both-feet shoeplay. Dangling, and shoeplay with open-toed shoes or mules, I'm afraid don't do as much for me.
Sweet and to the point:
My strong preference is for seated, both-feet shoeplay. Dangling, and shoeplay with open-toed shoes or mules, I'm afraid don't do as much for me.
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 8:48 am
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 663
- Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 2:12 am