Crazy For Feet Forum

HI, I have the same curiosity. BTW, here's another one which I'd really to find in the original version:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNYu7hMNFGk&t=2520s&ab_channel=ButGustaw

I usually don't like shoeplay with that kind of shoes, but the way she does it, in nylon and crushing the shoes, make it ...

My best result so far. Funny the dress of the second picture ... I didn't ask for that :-D

Screenshot 2024-10-17 at 19.17.08.png
Screenshot 2024-10-17 at 19.17.16.png


In picture 2 the legs are swapped :) looks a bit spooky.


Ah ah you're right. I didn't noticed it. And it was one of the ...

My best result so far. Funny the dress of the second picture ... I didn't ask for that :-D

Right, I am using a free account. Actually you were right that - giving again the same exact prompt - one out of 4 photo showed the woman feet.

The last ones were cool, but there is something strange in this application.
I tried your exact prompts, but my ladies have always their shoes on! I mean a pair of empty shoes lies on the floor, but they wear another pair. It is as if my images are censored :-O

I like this with pantyhose ... what prompt did you use?

They are getting better, but it seems to me that they have problems in rendering feet. They look weird.


The hogwarts picture posted above is VERY good. Of course, there is still room for improvement...but... it looks pretty great


Yes, it's the first time that I see a decent AI generated ...

They are getting better, but it seems to me that they have problems in rendering feet. They look weird.
Me I tried with other AI services and they were just ignoring my "shoes off" prompt and showing always the shoes on, as if they were censored. Scenarios like "tired businesswoman rubbing her foot ...

MM12 wrote: Tue Sep 24, 2024 8:18 pm Can't seem to find the original. There has to be more of her out there...

It's here:
There are a couple more but one is shot from a different angle and feet are not visibile, while another one is too short (just a heelpop as far as I have seen).

dipdang wrote: Tue Sep 24, 2024 7:29 am

Wow! This could have been wonderful if she wore shorter pants. I wonder where it is taken from.

- Professionally, I don't think it's a good look for her career that when you search her name into google, the first results are about feet and shoeplay, wether on wikifeet, youtube edits, this forum... I wouldn't be surprised she wants to get rid of this online reputation.


Good point, I never ...

Their job is to sell stuff and we don't buy anything at all :-)

They have 215k subscribers. How many of them are foot fetishists in your opinion?
Do you really think they pay the wage to 20 - 30 people with the page views of a hundred foot fetishists??
You should realize that they are just kind ...

Maybe they were just running out of space. I have no idea of the prices, but I guess you have to pay YT for the content you saved.

Censorship for a natural thing like dangling seems a little harsh. Also coincidence seems awfully crazy that her only shoeplay videos got changed. They all say “private” now


Who knows ... anyway in the 26.05.2024 videos there are two where she shoeplays: in one she dangles, in the other one she ...

Mr. Mike wrote: Mon May 27, 2024 11:44 am 𝐋𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐬 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐢𝐬 𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐘𝐓 𝐩𝐚𝐠𝐞. 𝐖𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐢𝐟 𝐰𝐞’𝐥𝐥 𝐬𝐞𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐲𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞

Me too, maybe we will understand if it was a case of "censorship" or just a coincidence (for example a technical problem, maybe they just blew up all the videos by mistake ... it happens sometimes

IMO the only way they could find this forum is that, when someone watches the embedded youtube link, this forum appears as the referrals in their logs.
I don't know what the owner of a youtube channel can see about this.


You can see external domains in YT Studio. That's why I always copy a ...

IMO the only way they could find this forum is that, when someone watches the embedded youtube link, this forum appears as the referrals in their logs.
I don't know what the owner of a youtube channel can see about this.

In that case it could be that their social media managers noticed a lot of ...

WTF :-O
I hope it is just a coincidence (some videos disappeared, some ar private, some are still there) and they just messed up their channel. Why the hell they would read this forum or check their referrals?)

Get in line :-)

Just joking ... anyway in the clip you can see on her left foot the big toe joint is a little bit noticeable (I am a failed doctor)

Here she does the entire interview shoeless in pantyhose feet. Awesome!



In my opinion, she's developing some small bunions that bother her. She started taking her shoes off now and then just this year, out of nowhere. That could be an explanation.